<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should speakers ban twitter at their talks?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.speakerconfessions.com/2009/04/should-speakers-ban-twitter-at-their-talks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.speakerconfessions.com/2009/04/should-speakers-ban-twitter-at-their-talks/</link>
	<description>A book of true tales from a veteran public speaker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:40:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Davidson</title>
		<link>http://www.speakerconfessions.com/2009/04/should-speakers-ban-twitter-at-their-talks/#comment-1639</link>
		<dc:creator>John Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 01:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speakerconfessions.com/?p=117#comment-1639</guid>
		<description>Interesting post. I agree that eye contact with the speaker not only benefits the listener but shows respect for the speaker. Twitter when used productively can add value to most any presentation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post. I agree that eye contact with the speaker not only benefits the listener but shows respect for the speaker. Twitter when used productively can add value to most any presentation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Tutorial 4 All &#187; Twitter and Webinars</title>
		<link>http://www.speakerconfessions.com/2009/04/should-speakers-ban-twitter-at-their-talks/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Tutorial 4 All &#187; Twitter and Webinars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 03:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speakerconfessions.com/?p=117#comment-180</guid>
		<description>[...] Should speakers ban twitter at their talks? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Should speakers ban twitter at their talks? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter and Webinars</title>
		<link>http://www.speakerconfessions.com/2009/04/should-speakers-ban-twitter-at-their-talks/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter and Webinars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 19:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speakerconfessions.com/?p=117#comment-113</guid>
		<description>[...] Should speakers ban twitter at their talks? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Should speakers ban twitter at their talks? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swan</title>
		<link>http://www.speakerconfessions.com/2009/04/should-speakers-ban-twitter-at-their-talks/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Swan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 14:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speakerconfessions.com/?p=117#comment-98</guid>
		<description>This is a great question/topic.   I can see it from both perspectives: speaker &amp; audience.

I am not a professional speaker, but I have done plenty of meeting presentations and it is certainly human nature to dislike the use of attendees&#039; electronic devices while speaking.  

Professional speakers, just like any performer, are very strongly driven by audience reaction and sometimes rely on it to help craft their speech in real time.   I think that speakers need to re-train themselves.  While in the past, use of devices meant working on other things (eg. email) now if a person is tweeting about your speech (as the numbers indicate), they are likely sharing your positive message.    That does three things
1.  It helps spread your message well beyond the room for the organization that paid you to speak.
2.  It provides great free marketing for other orgs to know about and possibly book you.
3.  Because the person has re-typed (possibly re-phrased) your words, they have internalized your message much better. 

I&#039;m not saying it is going to be easy, but just because it doesn&#039;t make you feel good, do not rail against the technology.  Think about the cost/benefit of the slight loss of attention vs. the increased exposure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great question/topic.   I can see it from both perspectives: speaker &amp; audience.</p>
<p>I am not a professional speaker, but I have done plenty of meeting presentations and it is certainly human nature to dislike the use of attendees&#8217; electronic devices while speaking.  </p>
<p>Professional speakers, just like any performer, are very strongly driven by audience reaction and sometimes rely on it to help craft their speech in real time.   I think that speakers need to re-train themselves.  While in the past, use of devices meant working on other things (eg. email) now if a person is tweeting about your speech (as the numbers indicate), they are likely sharing your positive message.    That does three things<br />
1.  It helps spread your message well beyond the room for the organization that paid you to speak.<br />
2.  It provides great free marketing for other orgs to know about and possibly book you.<br />
3.  Because the person has re-typed (possibly re-phrased) your words, they have internalized your message much better. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying it is going to be easy, but just because it doesn&#8217;t make you feel good, do not rail against the technology.  Think about the cost/benefit of the slight loss of attention vs. the increased exposure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Lead</title>
		<link>http://www.speakerconfessions.com/2009/04/should-speakers-ban-twitter-at-their-talks/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Lead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 03:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speakerconfessions.com/?p=117#comment-63</guid>
		<description>I hate the use of Twitter during presentations, but we do use it at our events before and after the presentations, and during the breaks.

There&#039;s a great Twitter visualiser at http://visibletweets.com which we display to maintain a sense of interest and fun.

I definitely wouldn&#039;t advocate using this during presentations though, as it is deliberately quite distracting. 
							PS: Wanted to say good post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate the use of Twitter during presentations, but we do use it at our events before and after the presentations, and during the breaks.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a great Twitter visualiser at <a href="http://visibletweets.com" rel="nofollow">http://visibletweets.com</a> which we display to maintain a sense of interest and fun.</p>
<p>I definitely wouldn&#8217;t advocate using this during presentations though, as it is deliberately quite distracting.<br />
							PS: Wanted to say good post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Lead</title>
		<link>http://www.speakerconfessions.com/2009/04/should-speakers-ban-twitter-at-their-talks/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Lead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 22:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speakerconfessions.com/?p=117#comment-61</guid>
		<description>I hate the use of Twitter during presentations, but we do use it at our events before and after the presentations, and during the breaks.

There&#039;s a great Twitter visualiser at http://visibletweets.com which we display to maintain a sense of interest and fun.

I definitely wouldn&#039;t advocate using this during presentations though, as it is deliberately quite distracting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate the use of Twitter during presentations, but we do use it at our events before and after the presentations, and during the breaks.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a great Twitter visualiser at <a href="http://visibletweets.com" rel="nofollow">http://visibletweets.com</a> which we display to maintain a sense of interest and fun.</p>
<p>I definitely wouldn&#8217;t advocate using this during presentations though, as it is deliberately quite distracting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Scofield</title>
		<link>http://www.speakerconfessions.com/2009/04/should-speakers-ban-twitter-at-their-talks/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Scofield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speakerconfessions.com/?p=117#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s an idea for a way Twitter can contribute to a talk: http://gilesbowkett.blogspot.com/2009/04/how-to-take-questions-at-tech.html

If you don&#039;t want to click through, the basic idea is that you tell attendees to direct all their questions to a designated twitter account during the session; when Q&amp;A starts, you then see what&#039;s been submitted and address.

This lets people ask questions when they arise, and it strongly encourages focus (since the question can only be 140 characters long). I&#039;m looking forward to trying this out at my next few presentations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an idea for a way Twitter can contribute to a talk: <a href="http://gilesbowkett.blogspot.com/2009/04/how-to-take-questions-at-tech.html" rel="nofollow">http://gilesbowkett.blogspot.com/2009/04/how-to-take-questions-at-tech.html</a></p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t want to click through, the basic idea is that you tell attendees to direct all their questions to a designated twitter account during the session; when Q&amp;A starts, you then see what&#8217;s been submitted and address.</p>
<p>This lets people ask questions when they arise, and it strongly encourages focus (since the question can only be 140 characters long). I&#8217;m looking forward to trying this out at my next few presentations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scottberkun.com &#187; Wednesday linkfest (+ Confessions)</title>
		<link>http://www.speakerconfessions.com/2009/04/should-speakers-ban-twitter-at-their-talks/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>scottberkun.com &#187; Wednesday linkfest (+ Confessions)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.speakerconfessions.com/?p=117#comment-58</guid>
		<description>[...] Should speakers ban or support twitter? - some nice data about how twitter was used at one popular talk. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Should speakers ban or support twitter? &#8211; some nice data about how twitter was used at one popular talk. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
